OpenAI, a non-profit research organization turned for-profit, is threatening legal action against a European computer science student. The Xtekky, who runs a ChatGPT 4 free project on GitHub.
The project offers free access to the GPT 4 and GPT 3.5 models. By routing questions through websites like You.com, Quora, and CoCalc to obtain answers.
The websites pay OpenAI fees to utilize its language models. The script used in the ChatGPT 4 project means that these sites end up footing the bill for users’ queries without even visiting them.
GPT-4 can generate "one click lawsuits": https://t.co/wnQ8Q7vsDC— korpi (@korpi87) March 15, 2023
Despite the legal threat, Xtekky plans to keep the repository up and has informed OpenAI that they should file a formal request with GitHub if they want it taken down instead of sending threats to him.
Xtekky argues that OpenAI should not target him if others use the websites’ APIs. Which are already available unsecured on the open web, and the websites should protect their APIs on their own.
However, OpenAI’s decision to send a notification to the student who runs the GPT-4 project has alarmed many about the company’s approach to intellectual property and its connection with the AI research community.
Some believe that OpenAI should be more open and make their platform more accessible and friendly for developers and researchers. Others argue that the company has a right to protect its intellectual property and that the GPT-4 free project represents a violation of that asset.
The GPT-3 language model is widely considered the most powerful the world has ever seen. It is capable of producing coherent, human-like text in response to prompts and is used for various applications, including chatbots, content creation, and language translation. Recently, OpenAI released the even more efficient and powerful chatGPT-4, a modified version of GPT-3.
However, to use GPT-4, users must pay for GPT plus access via OpenAI’s API. It finds a similar service that has paid to incorporate GPT-4 into their own solutions. The GPT-4 GitHub project offered a fourth alternative to these options, which OpenAI is threatening to take down.
The case highlights the importance of protecting APIs and ensuring that they are only used by authorized parties. Developers must take action to safeguard their APIs and ensure that only authorized parties use them. Furthermore, the incident raises questions about OpenAI’s intellectual property approach and its relationship with the AI research community.
While some believe that OpenAI should be more open and accessible, others believe that the company has a right to protect its intellectual property.
In conclusion, the case of OpenAI’s legal action against Xtekky highlights the importance of API protection and intellectual property rights. While there are arguments on both sides, it is crucial to find a balance between protecting intellectual property. It is encouraging accessibility and innovation in the AI research community.